AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

PINE POLLY, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTEGRATED PACKAGING FILMS IPF, INC., Defendant.

BOWLER

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) (DOCKET ENTRY # 7) BOWLER, U.S.M.J.

Pending before this court is a motion to dismiss certain counts of a complaint filed by plaintiff Pine Poly, Inc. ("plaintiff"). (Docket Entry # 7). Defendant Integrated Packaging Films IPF, Inc. ("defendant") seeks dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule 12(b)(6)"), and for failure to comply with Rule 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule 9(b)"). (Docket Entry #7). Plaintiff opposes the motion. (Docket Entry # 17). After conducting a hearing, this court took the motion under advisement.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff initially brought this action in the Massachusetts Superior Court Department (Essex County) on April 29, 2013. On the basis of diversity jurisdiction, defendant

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Pine Polly, Inc. v. Integrated Packaging Films IPF, Inc.
(Feb 27, 2014)