AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In re: TMST, INC., f/k/a THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC., et al., Chapter 11, Debtors. JOEL I SHER in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee for TMST, INC. f/k/a THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC., TMST HEDGING STRATEGIES, INC. f/k/a THORNBURG MORTGAGE HEDGING STRATEGIES, INC., and TMST HOME LOANS, INC. f/k/a THORNBURG MORTGAGE HOME LOANS, INC. Plaintiff v. JPMORGAN CHASE FUNDING INC. (AS SUCCESSOR TO BEAR STEARNS INVESTMENT PRODUCTS INC.), CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS LIMITED, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, CREDIT SUISSE INTERNATIONAL, RBS SECURITIES INC. (f/k/a GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS INC.), GREENWICH CAPITAL DERIVATIVES INC., ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC, AND UBS AG (AS SUCCESSOR TO UBS SECURITIES LLC), Defendants. The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are (i) TMST, Inc., f/k/a Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (ii) TMST Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., f/k/a Thornburg Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc. (iii) TMST Home Loans, Inc., f/k/a Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans, Inc. and (i

STIPULATION REVISING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

DUNCAN KEIR, Bankruptcy Judge

WHEREAS, on April 30, 2011, Joel I. Sher, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee for Debtors (the "Trustee"), filed a Complaint against the above-captioned defendants (the "Defendants"), which was subsequently amended by the filing of an Amended Complaint on June 8, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on May 19, 2011, the Court entered a Stipulation and Consent Order Regarding Schedule for Defendants to Respond to Complaint and Motion to Intervene (the "Scheduling Order"), which, inter alia, set agreed deadlines for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint, and, in the event the Defendants filed a motion or motions to dismiss, a briefing schedule for subsequent responses and replies in connection with such motions; and

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provided that its terms may be modified as to any Defendant and the Trustee by written agreement between the Trustee and the Defendant to which the agreement relates; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the outstanding deadlines provided in the Scheduling Order by six (6) days as set forth herein.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED that —

(1) each Defendant shall, on or before September 12, 2011, file an answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint (each, or collectively if a joint response is filed, an "Initial Response");
(2) the Trustee shall, on or before ninety (90) days following the filing of the last Initial Response by the Defendants, file an opposition(s) or other permitted response(s) thereto (each, or collectively if a consolidated response is filed, a "Trustee Response"); and
(3) Defendants (each or collectively) shall have until, but no more than, 45 days after the filing of the last Trustee Response to file a reply or replies thereto.

Signed: September 01, 2011

SO ORDERED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE TMST, INC. (Bankr.D.Md. 9-2-2011)
(Sep 2, 2011)