AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of Stefanie KATZ, respondent, v. Orya SHOMRON, appellant.

Orya Shomron, Belfast, Maine, appellant pro se. Gordon A. Burrows, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent.
Karen P. Simmons, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Janet Neustaetter of counsel), attorney for the children.


In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J.), dated February 5, 2013, which, without a hearing, granted the mother's petition for permission to relocate with the parties' children to Rockland County or Westchester County.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court possessed adequate relevant information to enable it to make an informed and provident determination, without a hearing, as to whether it was in the subject children's best interests to relocate with their mother ( see Matter of Hom v. Zullo, 6 A.D.3d 536, 775 N.Y.S.2d 66). The mother established a change of circumstances and that the proposed relocation to Rockland County or Westchester County would serve the subject children's best interests ( see Matter of Tropea v. Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727, 642 N.Y.S.2d 575, 665 N.E.2d 145). The mother also established that the proposed move would not have a negative impact on the children's relationship with the father ( see Matter of Linn v. Wilson, 68 A.D.3d 1767, 891 N.Y.S.2d 583).

The father's remaining contention is without merit. DILLON, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Katz v. Shomron
(Apr 9, 2014)