AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re SERENITY CELENE M., etc., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc.,Roy Enrique M., Respondent–Appellant,Abbott House, Petitioner–Respondent.

Randal S. Carmel, Syosset, for appellant. *698 Law Office of Quinlan and Fields, Hawthorne (Daniel Gartenstein of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Fernando Silva, J.), entered on or about June 3, 2011, which, among other things, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father's parental rights to the subject child and committed the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs, and the motion to relieve assigned counsel granted.

Upon our review of respondent's assigned counsel's motion and the record, we agree that the subject order is nonappealable since it was entered following respondent's default at both the fact-finding and dispositional hearings ( Matter of Zoraida Marie C., 66 A.D.3d 486, 886 N.Y.S.2d 165 [2009] ). In any event, there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal ( id.; Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [1967]; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1976] ).

SAXE, J.P., SWEENY, RENWICK, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Roy Enrique M. v. Abbott House (In re Serenity Celene M.)
(Mar 8, 2012)