AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

HAROLD R. BERK, indi v. dually and on behalf of a class similarly situated, Plaintiff,

ORDER

BERLE SCHILLER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Co., and Chase Auto Finance Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice and Strike Class Allegations (Document No. 21), Defendant Accounts Receivable Management Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Strike Class Allegations (Document No. 22), Plaintiffs response thereto, Defendants' replies thereon, and Plaintiffs sur-reply thereon, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated September 23, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:

1. The motions are GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against all Defendants.
2. The motions are GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim against Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Co., and Chase Auto Finance Corporation.
3. The motions are DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's intrusion upon seclusion claim against all Defendants.
4. The motions are DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Fair Debt Collections Practices Act claim against Defendant Accounts Receivable Management Inc.
3. The Motion to Extend Time for Motion for Class Certification (Document No. 15) is DENIED as moot.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BERK v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (E.D.Pa. 9-26-2011)
(Sep 26, 2011)