AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS TERRELL STOKES, Defendant.

JOHN A. ROSS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman (ECF No. 40). On December 30, 2013, Defendant Stokes filed the Motion to Suppress Statements and Evidence (ECF No. 21). Magistrate Judge Adelman recommends the Court deny the Motion to Suppress Statements and Evidence.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), these matters were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman, who filed a Report and Recommendation on April 11, 2014 (ECF No. 40). Defendant Stokes filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on April 30, 2014 (ECF No. 43). Defendant Stokes summarily states that he objects to several conclusions drawn by Magistrate Judge Adelman, but fails to provide any countervailing rationale for his position. The Court finds that Defendant Stokes' objections are not persuasive.

The Court granted Defendant Stokes leave to file his objections out of time. (ECF No. 44).

The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Suppress Statements and Evidence (ECF No. 21) be denied. After de novo review of this matter, this Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [40] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Suppress Statements and Evidence [21] is DENIED.

__________


JOHN A. ROSS


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Stokes
(May 1, 2014)