The challenged no probable cause determination was rationally based and not arbitrary and capricious ( see Matter of McFarland v New York State Diu. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108, 111-113). DHR has broad discretion in determining the method to be employed in investigating a claim, and the record shows that the investigation in this case was not "abbreviated or one-sided" ( Matter of Pascual v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 37 AD3d 215, 216; see also McFarland, 241 AD2d at 111-113).
We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.