Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

DANIEL BRENT MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CORPERAL LUSK, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY BAST, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY ODELL, Teller Sheriff, and DEPUTY MARTINEZ, Teller Sheriff, Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the ORDER [Doc. No. 145] of Judge R. Brooke Jackson entered on Jan. 29, 2014, APPROVING and ADOPTING the magistrate judge's recommendation that the action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the plaintiff's failure to comply with orders of the court, it is

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants LUSK, BAST, ODELL and MARTINEZ and against Plaintiff DANIEL BRENT MILLER, who recovers nothing, and the action is dismissed on the merits. Defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days' entry of judgment.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 3 day of February, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: __________


Julie Dynes, Deputy Clerk


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Miller v. Lusk
(Feb 3, 2014)