Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

SUSAN D. LILLY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

ORDER

At Wilmington this ____ day of March, 2012.

WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Thynge issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 28) dated January 30, 2012;

WHEREAS, the Report and Recommendation recommends that (1) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 23) be DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (D.I. 17) be GRANTED in part; (3) the matter be remanded for further analysis; and (4) Plaintiffs request for an award of benefits (D.I. 18) be DENIED.

WHEREAS, any Objections to the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 28) were to be filed by Februay 16,2012;

WHEREAS, neither party has filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation;

WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted for the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Thynge;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 28) is ADOPTED; and Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 23) is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 17) is GRANTED in part; (3) the matter is remanded for further analysis; and (4) Plaintiff's request for an award of benefits (D.I. 18) is DENIED.

______________________


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Lilly v. Astrue
(Mar 1, 2012)