Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant v. Michael WRIGHT and Randall Wright.

THEODORE A. McKEE

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Nos. 5:09–cr–00270–001 & 5:09–cr–00270–002), District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel.
Zane D. Memeger, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. Mark S. Greenberg, Esq., Lacheen Wittels & Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for Michael Wright.
Michael N. Huff, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, for Randall Wright.
Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.



ORDER


THEODORE A. McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge.


Upon further consideration, this Court concludes that rehearing en banc is not necessary in the above-captioned case. Accordingly, the order of this Court, dated July 6, 2012, ordering rehearing en banc is hereby vacated.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Wright
(Jul 11, 2012)