AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UHURU-SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH, and KEVIN SNODGRASS, Plaintiffs, v. HAROLD W. CLARK, et al., Defendant(s).

Glen E. Conrad

MEMORANDUM OPINION
By: Hon. Glen E. Conrad
Chief United States District Judge

Uhuru-Sekou Obataiye-Allah and Kevin Snodgrass, Virginia inmates proceeding pro se, filed a joint civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order entered May 28, 2014, the court directed plaintiffs to submit within 10 days from the date of the order their executed verified statements and documentation of exhaustion of administrative remedies and their inmate account information for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiffs were advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 10 days have elapsed, and plaintiffs have failed to comply with the described conditions. Plaintiffs both failed to return their verified statements and exhaustion documentation, and Plaintiff Obataiye-Allah failed to return the required financial information. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Each plaintiff may refile his claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.

__________


Chief United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Obataiye-Allah v. Clark
(Jul 1, 2014)