Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Janet S. MILLIKEN, Petitioner v. Kathleen JACONO and Joseph Jacono and Cascia Corporation, Trading as Re/Max Town & Country and Fran Day and Thomas O'Neill and Fox & Roach LP, Trading as Prudential Fox & Roach Realtors and John Restrepo, Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 67 MAL 2013.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.


AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is

DENIED

as to the remaining issue. The issues are:

(1) Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of [respondents] on the fraud claim because a material issue of fact existed as to whether their intentional concealment and non-disclosure of the gunshot murder/suicide led to a viable claim for fraud[.]

(2) Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of [respondents] on the claim of negligent misrepresentation because a material issue of fact existed as to whether [petitioner] had a viable claim for negligent misrepresentation[.]

(3) Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the [respondents] on [a] claim of a violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law because a material issue of fact existed as to whether [petitioner] had a viable claim for common law fraud which would lead to a viable claim under that statute[.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Milliken v. Jacono
(Jul 17, 2013)