Wireless Ink Corp. v. Google, Inc.

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

2013-1683

2013-1684

Attorney(S)

JEREMY S. PITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was PAPOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas. JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. JOFFRE and MELANIE L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were HEIDI L. KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were KEVIN X. MCGANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM GAHTAN, White & Case LLP, of New York, New York.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, AND FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC., Defendants. WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Nos. 11-cv-01751 and 10-cv-01841, Judge P. Kevin Castel.

JUDGMENT

JEREMY S. PITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was PAPOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas.

JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. JOFFRE and MELANIE L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were HEIDI L. KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were KEVIN X. MCGANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM GAHTAN, White & Case LLP, of New York, New York. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court

WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, AND FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC., Defendants. WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Comments