AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CURTIS PROCESSING COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. CM&E CALIFORNIA, INC., d/b/a CM&E INTERNATIONAL, JAMES SMART, and JACQUELYN SMART, Defendants, Counter-Plaintiffs, And Third Party Plaintiffs,

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RENEW JUDGMENT (#70)

On November 18, 2011, plaintiff filed an ex-parte motion to renew judgment in the above-entitled cause. On December 8, 2011, pursuant to Rule 7.1(f) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the court ordered a response deadline and ordered that there will be no oral hearing on this motion. The December 23, 2011 response deadline passed and no response was filed. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the motion,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to renew judgment is GRANTED and the Second Amended Judgment, entered January 7, 2002, is renewed for an additional ten years. Plaintiff is instructed to serve any parties not receiving electronic notification.

________________


GEORGE CARAM STEEH


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this order were served on the attorneys/parties of record on January 3, 2012, by electronic mail.

Josephine Chaffee


Secretary/Deputy Clerk


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Curtis Processing Co. v. CM&E California, Inc.
(Jan 3, 2012)