Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sakai SCOTT, Also Known as Blue, Appellant.

MULVEY, J.

Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Brittany Grome of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, DEVINE, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ.

Opinion

MULVEY, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Breslin, J.), rendered December 10, 2012 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of various drug-related charges against him, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. Supreme Court thereafter sentenced defendant, in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement, to six years in prison to be followed by one year of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant's contention, based upon our review of the plea colloquy and in consideration of his counseled written waiver of appeal, defendant was adequately informed that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the rights automatically forfeited by his guilty plea such that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v. O'Keefe, 133 A.D.3d 1034, 1034–1035, 19 N.Y.S.3d 196 [2015], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 1148, 32 N.Y.S.3d 62, 51 N.E.3d 573 [2016] ; People v. Oginski, 123 A.D.3d 1303, 1303, 996 N.Y.S.2d 799 [2014], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 970, 18 N.Y.S.3d 606, 40 N.E.3d 584 [2015] ). Further, given defendant's valid appeal waiver, he is precluded from challenging

his sentence as harsh and excessive (see People v. Griffin, 134 A.D.3d 1228, 1231, 20 N.Y.S.3d 738 [2015] ; People v. Donah, 127 A.D.3d 1413, 1413, 5 N.Y.S.3d 736 [2015] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Scott
(May 19, 2016)