AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

SHELBI L. SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC. a/k/a ESTEE LAUDER MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORE, Defendants.

SHERYL H. LIPMAN

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss (the "Report and Recommendation"), filed September 20, 2013. (ECF No. 15.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the parties be compelled to arbitrate this matter and the case be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 26.)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), "[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).

"When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) in its entirety.

Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of June, 2014.

__________


SHERYL H. LIPMAN


U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Sellers v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
(Jun 23, 2014)