Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Burke and Erckmann, for appellants, cite: Pecuniary legacies are not a charge on realty: 51 S.C. 375; 2 McC. Ch., 395; 5 S.C. 218; 2 S.C. 383; 22 S.C. 101; 1 Pet., 585; 14 rich. Eq., 245; 19 Ency., 1349; Speers Eq., 518; 17 S.C. 545; 6 Rich. Eq., 93; 59 Vt., 497. Owners of Williamsburg property should be made parties: 9 S.C. 436; Code of Proc., 143; Rich. Eq., 239. Messrs. Young Young and W.J. Fishburne, contra, cite: Is the legacy a charge on the lots? 6 Wheat., 229; 19 Ency., 1349, 1350, 1351; 2 Binney, 525; 27 S.C. 209; 46 S.C. 159; 51 S.C. 366; 1 Ves. Sr., 499; 1 Ver., 411; 2 Ver., 228; 7 H.L., 703; 19 Ency., 1352, 1353; 37 S.C. 485; 17 Ency., 23, 24; 48 S.C. 290; 128 Fed.R., 828; 28 S.C. 331; 18 Ency., 768. As to making personal representative a party: 11 Rich., Eq., 402; 1 Rich. Eq., 1; 48 S.C. 161, 296; 62 S.C. 426; 69 S.C. 38. This question cannot be raised after demurrer: 28 S.C. 450; 66 S.C. 342. Of what Court will take judicial notice: 17 Ency., 907, 908; 93 Mo., 452. 20-year limitation of lien does not apply here: 31 S.C. 1; Curtis v. Renneker, 34 S.C.; 185 U.S. 55; 30 S.C. 381; 71 S.C. 391; 7 S.C. 69; Speers Eq., 233; 7 Rich. Eq., 54.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Burke and Erckmann, for appellants, cite: Pecuniary legacies are not a charge on realty: 51 S.C. 375; 2 McC. Ch., 395; 5 S.C. 218; 2 S.C. 383; 22 S.C. 101; 1 Pet., 585; 14 rich. Eq., 245; 19 Ency., 1349; Speers Eq., 518; 17 S.C. 545; 6 Rich. Eq., 93; 59 Vt., 497. Owners of Williamsburg property should be made parties: 9 S.C. 436; Code of Proc., 143; Rich. Eq., 239. Messrs. Young Young and W.J. Fishburne, contra, cite: Is the legacy a charge on the lots? 6 Wheat., 229; 19 Ency., 1349, 1350, 1351; 2 Binney, 525; 27 S.C. 209; 46 S.C. 159; 51 S.C. 366; 1 Ves. Sr., 499; 1 Ver., 411; 2 Ver., 228; 7 H.L., 703; 19 Ency., 1352, 1353; 37 S.C. 485; 17 Ency., 23, 24; 48 S.C. 290; 128 Fed.R., 828; 28 S.C. 331; 18 Ency., 768. As to making personal representative a party: 11 Rich., Eq., 402; 1 Rich. Eq., 1; 48 S.C. 161, 296; 62 S.C. 426; 69 S.C. 38. This question cannot be raised after demurrer: 28 S.C. 450; 66 S.C. 342. Of what Court will take judicial notice: 17 Ency., 907, 908; 93 Mo., 452. 20-year limitation of lien does not apply here: 31 S.C. 1; Curtis v. Renneker, 34 S.C.; 185 U.S. 55; 30 S.C. 381; 71 S.C. 391; 7 S.C. 69; Speers Eq., 233; 7 Rich. Eq., 54.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

DIXON v. ROESSLER.

March 26, 1907. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE WOODS.

This Court is satisfied with the conclusion of the Circuit Judge and the reasoning on which it rests. We express no opinion, however, as to the character of the interest or estate which the daughter Margaret took in the lot on St. Philip street, as that point is not involved in the appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DIXON v. ROESSLER
(Mar 26, 1907)