STATE ex rel. PEARMAN v. KING

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

9834

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Kurtz P. Smith and J.S. Ackers, for appellants, cite: Const. 1895, art. III, section 34; 73 S.C. 194. Messrs. Watkins Prince, for petitioner-respondent, cite: Vol. II, Code of Laws, art. X of chap. 20, sections 1481, 1484 and 1528; chap. 102; Act of 25th March, 1916 (fixing salary of clerk of Court); art. III, sec. 34, Const. 1895; 66 S.C. 219; 61 S.C. 205; 99 S.C. 377; 73 S.C. 194.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

9834

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Kurtz P. Smith and J.S. Ackers, for appellants, cite: Const. 1895, art. III, section 34; 73 S.C. 194. Messrs. Watkins Prince, for petitioner-respondent, cite: Vol. II, Code of Laws, art. X of chap. 20, sections 1481, 1484 and 1528; chap. 102; Act of 25th March, 1916 (fixing salary of clerk of Court); art. III, sec. 34, Const. 1895; 66 S.C. 219; 61 S.C. 205; 99 S.C. 377; 73 S.C. 194.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

STATE EX REL. PEARMAN v. KING ET AL.

December 17, 1918. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.

For the reasons therein assigned, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, FRASER and GAGE concur.

MR. JUSTICE HYDRICK did not sit in this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.