Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number 10889 Attorney(S) Messrs. Nathans Sinkler, for appellant, cite: Petition of majority of freeholders is necessary: Art. 2, Sec. 13, Const. 1895. Provision as to advertising not complied with: 31 Stat. 534, 535, 537. Submission of two purposes illegal: 31 Stat., 537; Art. 8, Sec. 7; Art. 10, Sec. 3., Const. 1895. Requirements as to passage of Act, with amendments, not complied with: Art. 16, Sec. 1; Art. 3, Sec. 18, Const. 1895. Mr. Philip H. Arrowsmith, for respondent, cites: Validating Act: 80 S.C. 518; 92 S.C. 318. Statute authorized joint submission of purposes of issue: 83 S.C. 546. Amendment of Act need not be read three times: 33 S.C. 57. See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. LUCAS v. BARRINGER, MAYOR, ET AL. May 24, 1922. The opinion of the Court was delivered by MR. JUSTICE WATTS. For the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge Shipp, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MR. JUSTICES FRASER, COTHRAN, and MARION, concur.