Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Lee Moise, Purdy Bland and M.W. Seabrook, for appellant, cite: Plaintiff as overseer entitled to compensation for labor: 20 S.C. 11; 2 Bail 581; 40 S.C. 51. Entitled to no more than share of profits when crop divided or sold: 12 Allen (Mass.), 354; 17 C.J., 862; note 87; 5 Vana (Ky.), 536. Answer must be considered as a whole: 15 S.C. 268; 9 S.C. 459; 2 Strob., 415; 22 C.J., 332. Pleading must not be construed against pleader: 12 S.C. 1; 12 S.C. 576; 25 S.C. 123; 38 S.C. 241; 8 S.C. 104; 29 S.C. 258; 75 S.C. 125. Improper for jury to keep notes: 38 S.C. 182. Messrs. Raymon Schwartz and Epps Levy, for respondent, cite: Allegation of complaint not denied is admitted: 16 S.C. 579; Code Proc. 1912 Sec. 219; 35 S.C. 165; 98 S.C. 136. Denial of whole transaction does not come within Code Proc., 1912 Sec. 438; 26 S.C. 163; 34 S.C. 246; 30 S.C. 289; 78 S.C. 23. Where funds are traced into hands of a fiduciary he must account for them: 100 S.C. 51; 115 S.C. 262. As to granting supersedeas: 35 S.C. 584.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Lee Moise, Purdy Bland and M.W. Seabrook, for appellant, cite: Plaintiff as overseer entitled to compensation for labor: 20 S.C. 11; 2 Bail 581; 40 S.C. 51. Entitled to no more than share of profits when crop divided or sold: 12 Allen (Mass.), 354; 17 C.J., 862; note 87; 5 Vana (Ky.), 536. Answer must be considered as a whole: 15 S.C. 268; 9 S.C. 459; 2 Strob., 415; 22 C.J., 332. Pleading must not be construed against pleader: 12 S.C. 1; 12 S.C. 576; 25 S.C. 123; 38 S.C. 241; 8 S.C. 104; 29 S.C. 258; 75 S.C. 125. Improper for jury to keep notes: 38 S.C. 182. Messrs. Raymon Schwartz and Epps Levy, for respondent, cite: Allegation of complaint not denied is admitted: 16 S.C. 579; Code Proc. 1912 Sec. 219; 35 S.C. 165; 98 S.C. 136. Denial of whole transaction does not come within Code Proc., 1912 Sec. 438; 26 S.C. 163; 34 S.C. 246; 30 S.C. 289; 78 S.C. 23. Where funds are traced into hands of a fiduciary he must account for them: 100 S.C. 51; 115 S.C. 262. As to granting supersedeas: 35 S.C. 584.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

WELLS v. SUMTER TRUST CO., Exor.

May 1, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.

The principal issue of fact under the pleadings arises out of the allegations in the second paragraph of the complaint and their denial by the second paragraph of the answer. There was testimony tending to sustain the allegations of the complaint, and the findings of fact by the jury are not reviewable by this Court. It is not necessary to consider the exceptions in detail, as none of them, when the case is considered in its entirety, show prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICES FRASER and MARION concur.

MR. JUSTICE WATTS dissents.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN disqualified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WELLS v. SUMTER TRUST CO., EXOR
(May 1, 1923)