BANK v. SOVEREIGN CAMP W.O.W

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

11668

Attorney(S)

Mr. Philip H. Arrowsmith, for appellant, cites: Sovereign Camp liable for negligence or default of local clerk: 102 S.C. 393; 119 S.C. 402. Principal bound by knowledge of agent: 31 Cyc., 1393; 21 R.C.L., 842; 119 S.C. 39. Messrs. Dargan Paulling, for respondent, cite: Assignment inadequate: 49 So., 233; 27 Atl., 1088; 25 S.C.L., 197; 61 S.E., 70; 88 N.Y.S., 607; 6 L.R.A., 475; 60 P. 563; 20 L.Ed., 762; 202 Fed., 791; 157 Fed., 815. Principal and agent: 31 Cyc., 1587; Sec. 4a; 119 S.C. 39. No waiver: 3 Code 1922, Sec. 4160; 92 N.E., 144. Death benefit not assignable: 3 Code 1922, Sec. 4151, 4171; 102 S.W., 636; 92 Atl., 1071; 156 S.W. 11; 122 S.E., 682.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

11668

Attorney(S)

Mr. Philip H. Arrowsmith, for appellant, cites: Sovereign Camp liable for negligence or default of local clerk: 102 S.C. 393; 119 S.C. 402. Principal bound by knowledge of agent: 31 Cyc., 1393; 21 R.C.L., 842; 119 S.C. 39. Messrs. Dargan Paulling, for respondent, cite: Assignment inadequate: 49 So., 233; 27 Atl., 1088; 25 S.C.L., 197; 61 S.E., 70; 88 N.Y.S., 607; 6 L.R.A., 475; 60 P. 563; 20 L.Ed., 762; 202 Fed., 791; 157 Fed., 815. Principal and agent: 31 Cyc., 1587; Sec. 4a; 119 S.C. 39. No waiver: 3 Code 1922, Sec. 4160; 92 N.E., 144. Death benefit not assignable: 3 Code 1922, Sec. 4151, 4171; 102 S.W., 636; 92 Atl., 1071; 156 S.W. 11; 122 S.E., 682.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BANK OF JOHNSONVILLE, S.C. v. SOVEREIGN CAMP W.O.W.

January 29, 1925. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE MARION.

We are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by Circuit Judge Dennis, in his very clearly reasoned decree, is correct, and while there are other valid grounds upon which that conclusion might be rested, we are content to approve and affirm the decree of the Circuit Court for the reasons therein stated.

Affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and FRASER, and MR. ACTING JUSTICE W.C. COTHRAN concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MR. JUSTICE T.P. COTHRAN did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BANK OF JOHNSONVILLE, S.C. v. SOVEREIGN CAMP W.O.W.

Comments