BOLT v. LIGON

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12418

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Luther K. Brice and Lyles, Daniel Drummond, for appellant, cite: Where general and specific provisions of a contract deal with the same subject matter, the specific provisions are to control: 114 Pac., 429; 115 N.W., 383; 145 Pac., 492; 13 C.J., 537; 97 Am. Dec., 179; 127 N.W., 1109. Construction of ambiguous contracts: 13 C.J., 525; 106 S.E., 390; 115 S.E., 712; 151 N.Y.S., 1045; 153 N YS., 985; 102 N.E., 481; 177 Ill., 500; 51 Sou., 853. Not in province of a Court to change the terms of a contract: 13 C.J., 541; 84 Pac., 535. Messrs. Wilton H. Earle and Bomar Osborne, for respondent, cite: Interpretation of contracts: 100 S.C. 9; 89 S.C. 80, 81; 2 Page on Contracts, Sec. 1113; 13 C.J., 545; 53 Sou., 542. Doctrine of "ejusdem generis" not applicable here: 83 S.C. 566; 102 S.C. 498; 106 Pac., 950; 2 Page on Contracts, Sec. 1121.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12418

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Luther K. Brice and Lyles, Daniel Drummond, for appellant, cite: Where general and specific provisions of a contract deal with the same subject matter, the specific provisions are to control: 114 Pac., 429; 115 N.W., 383; 145 Pac., 492; 13 C.J., 537; 97 Am. Dec., 179; 127 N.W., 1109. Construction of ambiguous contracts: 13 C.J., 525; 106 S.E., 390; 115 S.E., 712; 151 N.Y.S., 1045; 153 N YS., 985; 102 N.E., 481; 177 Ill., 500; 51 Sou., 853. Not in province of a Court to change the terms of a contract: 13 C.J., 541; 84 Pac., 535. Messrs. Wilton H. Earle and Bomar Osborne, for respondent, cite: Interpretation of contracts: 100 S.C. 9; 89 S.C. 80, 81; 2 Page on Contracts, Sec. 1113; 13 C.J., 545; 53 Sou., 542. Doctrine of "ejusdem generis" not applicable here: 83 S.C. 566; 102 S.C. 498; 106 Pac., 950; 2 Page on Contracts, Sec. 1121.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

BOLT v. LIGON.

March 30, 1928. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE BLEASE.

The decree of his Honor, E.C. Dennis, Circuit Judge in this cause, is entirely satisfactory to this Court. The same will be reported.

It is the judgment of this Court that the exceptions to the said decree be and same are hereby dismissed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, STABLER and CARTER concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.