Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. J.J. Cantey, for appellant, cites: Court seeks to do substantial justice, not adhering strictly to legal rule: 92 S.C. 362; 108 S.C. 171; 114 S.E., 39; Id., 162; Id., 320; Id., 338; Id., 496; 116 S.C. 210; 117 S.C. 27; 118 S.C. 38; Id., 77; 119 S.C. 2; 121 S.C. 327; 122 S.C. 142; Id., 360; 125 S.C. 172; Id., 314; 131 S.C. 306; 126 S.C. 498; 133 S.C. 95; 129 S.C. 40; 138 S.C. 354. As to priority of liens: 120 S. 1C., 483. Volunteer is not bona fide purchaser: 124 U.S. 534; 106 S.C. 319; 111 S.C. 322. As to subrogation: 139 S.C. 400. "Bona fide purchaser": 129 S.C. 270; Id., 415. Fraud: 84 S.C. 222. Estopped from setting up homestead: 51 S.C. 101; 65 S.C. 237; 12 R.C.L., 65. Conveyance of inchoate right to homestead before it has ripened into homestead forfeits such right: 73 S.C. 326; 64 S.C. 82; 55 S.C. 199; 133 S.C. 104. Mr. Fred Lesesne, for respondents, cites: An equity of redemption will support a homestead right: 24 S.C. 36; 64 S.C. 82; Ar. 3, Sec. 28, Const.; 51 S.C. 97; 25 S.C. 389; 26 S.C. 227. Messrs. Dinkins Stukes, also for respondents, cite: Findings of fact by Master concurred in by Circuit Judge sustained unless against preponderance of evidence: 11 S.C. 29; 103 S.C. 307. As to right of equity accruing: 28 S.C. 110; 13 S.C. 451; 28 S.C. 152. As to subrogation here: 139 S.C. 597; 88 S.C. 432. Judgment is not a lien upon property of judgment debtor exempt from attachment: Sec. 610 Code Proc. Homestead exemption: Ar. 3, Sec. 28, Const.; Sec. 5490 Code. Property exempt from debts by statute cannot be reached by creditors on ground that it has been fraudulently conveyed: 12 R.C. L., 505.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. J.J. Cantey, for appellant, cites: Court seeks to do substantial justice, not adhering strictly to legal rule: 92 S.C. 362; 108 S.C. 171; 114 S.E., 39; Id., 162; Id., 320; Id., 338; Id., 496; 116 S.C. 210; 117 S.C. 27; 118 S.C. 38; Id., 77; 119 S.C. 2; 121 S.C. 327; 122 S.C. 142; Id., 360; 125 S.C. 172; Id., 314; 131 S.C. 306; 126 S.C. 498; 133 S.C. 95; 129 S.C. 40; 138 S.C. 354. As to priority of liens: 120 S. 1C., 483. Volunteer is not bona fide purchaser: 124 U.S. 534; 106 S.C. 319; 111 S.C. 322. As to subrogation: 139 S.C. 400. "Bona fide purchaser": 129 S.C. 270; Id., 415. Fraud: 84 S.C. 222. Estopped from setting up homestead: 51 S.C. 101; 65 S.C. 237; 12 R.C.L., 65. Conveyance of inchoate right to homestead before it has ripened into homestead forfeits such right: 73 S.C. 326; 64 S.C. 82; 55 S.C. 199; 133 S.C. 104. Mr. Fred Lesesne, for respondents, cites: An equity of redemption will support a homestead right: 24 S.C. 36; 64 S.C. 82; Ar. 3, Sec. 28, Const.; 51 S.C. 97; 25 S.C. 389; 26 S.C. 227. Messrs. Dinkins Stukes, also for respondents, cite: Findings of fact by Master concurred in by Circuit Judge sustained unless against preponderance of evidence: 11 S.C. 29; 103 S.C. 307. As to right of equity accruing: 28 S.C. 110; 13 S.C. 451; 28 S.C. 152. As to subrogation here: 139 S.C. 597; 88 S.C. 432. Judgment is not a lien upon property of judgment debtor exempt from attachment: Sec. 610 Code Proc. Homestead exemption: Ar. 3, Sec. 28, Const.; Sec. 5490 Code. Property exempt from debts by statute cannot be reached by creditors on ground that it has been fraudulently conveyed: 12 R.C. L., 505.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

JAMES v. MARTIN ET AL.

April 4, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN.

This Court is entirely satisfied with the report of the Referee confirmed by the Circuit Judge.

Decree affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MESSRS. JUSTICES BLEASE, STABLER and CARTER concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

JAMES v. MARTIN et al
(Apr 4, 1929)