Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. D. Gordon Baker for appellant, cites: Demurrer admits allegations of defense and counterclaim: 134 S.C. 324; 141 S.C. 98; 141 S.C. 364; 142 S.C. 369; 131 S.C. 48; 124 S.C. 498; 108 S.C. 364; 112 S.E., 426; 114 S.C. 482; 167 Fed., 367; 69 S.C. 520; reversed by 144 S.C. 137. Act of Court beyond power delegated is a nullity: 254 U.S. 358; 251 Fed., 986; 119 N.E., 940; 193 Pa., 909; 155 Fed., 110; 83 Vt., 174. Jurisdiction fixed by amount involved in demands of plaintiff and defendant: 251 Fed., 213; 192 U.S. 232; 204 U.S. 286; 227 Fed., 321; 74 Fed., 424; 176 Fed., 343. Consent cannot confer jurisdiction over subject matter: Court cannot reduce claim below jurisdictional amount to give jurisdiction: 144 S.C. 164; 210 N.Y.S., 618; 189 S.W. 296; 241 S.W., 1084. Waiver of portion of demand will not confer jurisdiction: 80 S.E., 699; 77 N.J. Law, 325; 155 N.Y.S., 167; 175 S.W. 863; 3 McC., 280; 1 N McC., 192; 3 Brev., 407; 72 S.C. 582. Defendant must set up in answer all matters of defense between parties: 134 S.C. 373; 144 S.C. 137; 9 S.C. 281; 313 S.C. 543; 77 S.C. 507; 87 S.C. 132; 26 Stat. 119; Code Civil Procedure, 1922 Sec. 410, 411. Court had no right to adjudicate upon counterclaim beyond jurisdictional amount: 113 S.C. 487; 15 C.J., 774; 43 S.C. 63; 150 S.E., 316. Appellant is estopped from bringing further action against respondent: 150 S.C. 345; 71 S.C. 95; 90 S.C. 229; 146 S.C. 290. Mr. Sam J. Royall for respondent, cites: Jurisdiction is determined by amount claimed by plaintiff and cannot be defeated by counterclaim for larger amount: 69 S.C. 520; 134 S.C. 373.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. D. Gordon Baker for appellant, cites: Demurrer admits allegations of defense and counterclaim: 134 S.C. 324; 141 S.C. 98; 141 S.C. 364; 142 S.C. 369; 131 S.C. 48; 124 S.C. 498; 108 S.C. 364; 112 S.E., 426; 114 S.C. 482; 167 Fed., 367; 69 S.C. 520; reversed by 144 S.C. 137. Act of Court beyond power delegated is a nullity: 254 U.S. 358; 251 Fed., 986; 119 N.E., 940; 193 Pa., 909; 155 Fed., 110; 83 Vt., 174. Jurisdiction fixed by amount involved in demands of plaintiff and defendant: 251 Fed., 213; 192 U.S. 232; 204 U.S. 286; 227 Fed., 321; 74 Fed., 424; 176 Fed., 343. Consent cannot confer jurisdiction over subject matter: Court cannot reduce claim below jurisdictional amount to give jurisdiction: 144 S.C. 164; 210 N.Y.S., 618; 189 S.W. 296; 241 S.W., 1084. Waiver of portion of demand will not confer jurisdiction: 80 S.E., 699; 77 N.J. Law, 325; 155 N.Y.S., 167; 175 S.W. 863; 3 McC., 280; 1 N McC., 192; 3 Brev., 407; 72 S.C. 582. Defendant must set up in answer all matters of defense between parties: 134 S.C. 373; 144 S.C. 137; 9 S.C. 281; 313 S.C. 543; 77 S.C. 507; 87 S.C. 132; 26 Stat. 119; Code Civil Procedure, 1922 Sec. 410, 411. Court had no right to adjudicate upon counterclaim beyond jurisdictional amount: 113 S.C. 487; 15 C.J., 774; 43 S.C. 63; 150 S.E., 316. Appellant is estopped from bringing further action against respondent: 150 S.C. 345; 71 S.C. 95; 90 S.C. 229; 146 S.C. 290. Mr. Sam J. Royall for respondent, cites: Jurisdiction is determined by amount claimed by plaintiff and cannot be defeated by counterclaim for larger amount: 69 S.C. 520; 134 S.C. 373.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

DUPRE v. GILLAND.

April 25, 1930. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN.

For the reasons stated by the trial Judge, which are entirely satisfactory to this Court, the order appealed from is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MESSRS. JUSTICES BLEASE, STABLER and CARTER concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DuPRE v. GILLAND
(Apr 25, 1930)