Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, Inc., v. LITTLE.

PER CURIAM.

We find no errors in the proceedings and judgment below. Holding that the version of the accident which the trial court, for purposes of discussion, gave in its opinion denying the motion for a new trial was such as the jury could validly find from competent evidence in the case, and believing that the trial court in its opinion fully considered, and adequately expressed our views on, the main questions now here on appeal we affirm the judgment on Judge Kirkpatrick's opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY v. LITTLE
(May 4, 1931)