COHEN v. WILLIAMS et al

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13356

Attorney(S)

Mr. W.M. Smoak, for appellant, cites: Doctrine of estoppel applies: 83 S.C. 173. Bidder has reasonable time to ascertain whether title defective: 87 S.C. 357; 24 Cyc., 33; 83 S.C. 172; 77 S.C. 393; 12 S.C. 75. Confirmation gives purchaser equitable title: 67 S.C. 553; 24 Cyc., 49; 883 S.C. 172. Notes bearing unlawful interest usurious although for deferred payments: 39 Cyc., 927; 43 S.C. 86; 2 Rich. L., 73; 92 S.C. 338; 32 S.C. 594; 160 S.C. 457; 67 S.C. 553; 46 S.E., 479; 4 S.E., 116; 85 Ala., 417; 3 McCord L., 256. Messrs. H.L. O'Bannon and T.M. Boulware, for respondent, cite: Party must state proper ground of objection: 142 S.C. 284; 140 S.E., 560; 86 S.C. 66; 68 S.E., 133; 119 S.C. 368; 112 S.E., 332; 136 S.C. 68; 134 S.E., 213; 148 S.C. 511; 146 S.E., 543. Parol testimony may be received to prove agreement in which written instrument originated: 31 S.C. 313; 9 S.E., 966; 159 S.E., 503; 97 S.C. 278; 81 S.E., 519. Appeal should not disturb concurring opinions of master and Circuit Judge: 128 S.C. 31; 144 S.C. 70; 150 S.C. 244.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13356

Attorney(S)

Mr. W.M. Smoak, for appellant, cites: Doctrine of estoppel applies: 83 S.C. 173. Bidder has reasonable time to ascertain whether title defective: 87 S.C. 357; 24 Cyc., 33; 83 S.C. 172; 77 S.C. 393; 12 S.C. 75. Confirmation gives purchaser equitable title: 67 S.C. 553; 24 Cyc., 49; 883 S.C. 172. Notes bearing unlawful interest usurious although for deferred payments: 39 Cyc., 927; 43 S.C. 86; 2 Rich. L., 73; 92 S.C. 338; 32 S.C. 594; 160 S.C. 457; 67 S.C. 553; 46 S.E., 479; 4 S.E., 116; 85 Ala., 417; 3 McCord L., 256. Messrs. H.L. O'Bannon and T.M. Boulware, for respondent, cite: Party must state proper ground of objection: 142 S.C. 284; 140 S.E., 560; 86 S.C. 66; 68 S.E., 133; 119 S.C. 368; 112 S.E., 332; 136 S.C. 68; 134 S.E., 213; 148 S.C. 511; 146 S.E., 543. Parol testimony may be received to prove agreement in which written instrument originated: 31 S.C. 313; 9 S.E., 966; 159 S.E., 503; 97 S.C. 278; 81 S.E., 519. Appeal should not disturb concurring opinions of master and Circuit Judge: 128 S.C. 31; 144 S.C. 70; 150 S.C. 244.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

COHEN v. WILLIAMS ET AL.

February 24, 1932. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE.

The very carefully prepared report of the special referee, Hon. E.H. Henderson, in this cause, sets forth clearly the facts and correctly disposes of the legal issues involved. The decree of the Circuit Judge approved the special referee's report. Our examination of the record convinces us that the exceptions of the appellant should be overruled.

The judgment of this Court is that the decree appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICE STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM concur.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN did not participate on account of illness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

COHEN v. WILLIAMS ET AL.

Comments