Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Samuel Want and Melvin Hyman, for appellants, cite: Illegal divorce: 2 Strob., 6; 1 Hill., 8; 5 Rich. Eq., 121; 76 S.C. 145; 56 S.E., 673; 110 S. C ., 253; 96 S.E., 294; 181 U.S. 155; 45 L.Ed., 794; 201 U.S. 562; 50 L.Ed., 857; 57 L.Ed., 347; 47 L.Ed., 366; 61 L.Ed., 967; 232 U.S. 619; 58 L.Ed., 758; 44 S.C. 195; 116 S.C. 338; 108 S.E., 101; 124 S.C. 229; 110 S.C. 253; 76 S.C. 145; 125 S.C. 89; 48 S.C. 492; 132 S.C. 288. Messrs. W.F. Stevenson and L.C. Wannamaker, for respondent, cite: As to right of dower: 33 S.C. 194; 117 S.C. 32; 37 S.C. 285; 12 S.C. 480; 31 S.C. 563. Divorce: 125 S.C. 105; 132 S.C. 294; 125 S.C. 89; 118 S.E., 178; L.R.A., 1916-F, 582; 161 S.C. 450; 116 S.C. 338. Estoppel: 44 S.C. 195; 6 L.Ed., 603; 106 A., 86.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Samuel Want and Melvin Hyman, for appellants, cite: Illegal divorce: 2 Strob., 6; 1 Hill., 8; 5 Rich. Eq., 121; 76 S.C. 145; 56 S.E., 673; 110 S. C ., 253; 96 S.E., 294; 181 U.S. 155; 45 L.Ed., 794; 201 U.S. 562; 50 L.Ed., 857; 57 L.Ed., 347; 47 L.Ed., 366; 61 L.Ed., 967; 232 U.S. 619; 58 L.Ed., 758; 44 S.C. 195; 116 S.C. 338; 108 S.E., 101; 124 S.C. 229; 110 S.C. 253; 76 S.C. 145; 125 S.C. 89; 48 S.C. 492; 132 S.C. 288. Messrs. W.F. Stevenson and L.C. Wannamaker, for respondent, cite: As to right of dower: 33 S.C. 194; 117 S.C. 32; 37 S.C. 285; 12 S.C. 480; 31 S.C. 563. Divorce: 125 S.C. 105; 132 S.C. 294; 125 S.C. 89; 118 S.E., 178; L.R.A., 1916-F, 582; 161 S.C. 450; 116 S.C. 338. Estoppel: 44 S.C. 195; 6 L.Ed., 603; 106 A., 86.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

WATSON ET AL. v. WATSON ET AL.TERRELL ET AL.

April 10, 1934. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE STABLER.

We think the questions raised in these two suits were properly disposed of by the Master; and his excellent report, affirmed by the Circuit Judge, is made the opinion of this Court.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE, and MESSRS. JUSTICES CARTER and BONHAM, and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE W.C. COTHRAN concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WATSON et al. v. WATSON et al
(Apr 10, 1934)