CROOK v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. et al

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13968

Attorney(S)

Messrs. J.C. Hiott, Adam H. Moss and James A. Moss, for appellant, cite: Construction of statutes: 169 S.C. 203; 31 S.C. 554; 128 Cal., 16; 61 C.J., 1304; 107 S.C. 469; 21 C.J., 202; 48 P., 66, 100 S.C. 402; 59 C.J., 1036; 132 N.W., 495; 37 Cyc., 1370. Contingent remainder: 87 S.C. 59; 8 Ohio, 216; 44 Wis. 489; 118 N.W., 853. As to rights of life tenant: 31 S.C. 118; 50 S.C. 534; 64 S.C. 413; 23 S.C. 148. Mr. L. Marion Gressette, for respondent, cites: Policy is personal contract between insurer and insured: 48 S.C. 195; 26 S.E., 323; 26 S.C. 505; 23 S.E., 490; 31 S.C. 91; 9 S.E., 973; 50 S.C. 514; 27 S.E., 952; 39 S.C. 298; 17 S.E., 678; 160 S.E., 460; 26 R.C.L., 427; 61 C.J., 1291.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13968

Attorney(S)

Messrs. J.C. Hiott, Adam H. Moss and James A. Moss, for appellant, cite: Construction of statutes: 169 S.C. 203; 31 S.C. 554; 128 Cal., 16; 61 C.J., 1304; 107 S.C. 469; 21 C.J., 202; 48 P., 66, 100 S.C. 402; 59 C.J., 1036; 132 N.W., 495; 37 Cyc., 1370. Contingent remainder: 87 S.C. 59; 8 Ohio, 216; 44 Wis. 489; 118 N.W., 853. As to rights of life tenant: 31 S.C. 118; 50 S.C. 534; 64 S.C. 413; 23 S.C. 148. Mr. L. Marion Gressette, for respondent, cites: Policy is personal contract between insurer and insured: 48 S.C. 195; 26 S.E., 323; 26 S.C. 505; 23 S.E., 490; 31 S.C. 91; 9 S.E., 973; 50 S.C. 514; 27 S.E., 952; 39 S.C. 298; 17 S.E., 678; 160 S.E., 460; 26 R.C.L., 427; 61 C.J., 1291.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CROOK v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. ET AL.

January 9, 1935.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. C.J. RAMAGE, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE.

The decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Oxner, is satisfactory to the Court and is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court. The decree which will be reported is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CROOK v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. ET AL.

Comments