BROWN et al. v. LOWE et ux

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14366

Attorney(S)

Messrs. R.B. Harrelson and L.D. Lide, for appellants, cite: Equitable offset: 165 S.C. 448; 161 S.C. 77; 91 S.C. 163; 133 S.C. 431; 168 S.E., 103; 159 S.W. 838; 146 U.S. 499; 36 L.Ed., 1959; 136 S.C. 179; 47 A.S. R., 576, 172, 276; 131 N.E., 857; 166 A., 871; 80 A.L.R., 1480. Assets of insolvent corporation should be distributed ratably among creditors: 77 S.C. 310. Mr. A.F. Woods, for respondents, cites: As to agreed stipulation of fact: 174 S.C. 24; 176 S.E., 880; 114 S.C. 494; 104 S.E., 184; 156 S.C. 480; 153 S.E., 462; 175 S.C. 291; 179 S.E., 34; 176 S.C. 318; 180 S.E., 188. Offset: 7 C.J., 641; 101 S.C. 457; 86 S.E., 26; 172 S.C. 305; 174 S.E., 23; 91 S.C. 163; 74 S.E., 361; 136 S.C. 179; 134 S.E., 285; 131 N.E., 857; 16 A.L.R., 1484; 90 A., 369; 166 A., 871.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14366

Attorney(S)

Messrs. R.B. Harrelson and L.D. Lide, for appellants, cite: Equitable offset: 165 S.C. 448; 161 S.C. 77; 91 S.C. 163; 133 S.C. 431; 168 S.E., 103; 159 S.W. 838; 146 U.S. 499; 36 L.Ed., 1959; 136 S.C. 179; 47 A.S. R., 576, 172, 276; 131 N.E., 857; 166 A., 871; 80 A.L.R., 1480. Assets of insolvent corporation should be distributed ratably among creditors: 77 S.C. 310. Mr. A.F. Woods, for respondents, cites: As to agreed stipulation of fact: 174 S.C. 24; 176 S.E., 880; 114 S.C. 494; 104 S.E., 184; 156 S.C. 480; 153 S.E., 462; 175 S.C. 291; 179 S.E., 34; 176 S.C. 318; 180 S.E., 188. Offset: 7 C.J., 641; 101 S.C. 457; 86 S.E., 26; 172 S.C. 305; 174 S.E., 23; 91 S.C. 163; 74 S.E., 361; 136 S.C. 179; 134 S.E., 285; 131 N.E., 857; 16 A.L.R., 1484; 90 A., 369; 166 A., 871.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BROWN ET AL. v. LOWE ET UX.

October 29, 1936. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STABLER.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Dennis correctly construed the written agreement referred to in his order, and that he properly disposed of all issues involved in the case. For the reasons, therefore, stated by him in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES BONHAM, BAKER and FISHBURNE, and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE A.L. GASTON concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BROWN ET AL. v. LOWE ET UX.

Comments