Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SPEARMAN v. F.S. ROYSTER GUANO CO. ET AL.

October 31, 1938. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STABLER.Page 408

The appeal in this case is from an order of the Circuit Court affirming an award of the South Carolina Industrial Commission. In his well-prepared decree, as will be seen, Judge Sease, by whom the matter was heard, gave much thought and full consideration to the several questions involved in the controversy; and this Court is entirely satisfied, from a careful examination of the record, with the conclusions reached by him.

The Circuit decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES BONHAM, BAKER and FISHBURNE concur.

MR. JUSTICE CARTER did not participate on account of illness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPEARMAN v. F.S. ROYSTER GUANO CO. et al
(Oct 31, 1938)