Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

GOODRICH SILVERTOWN, INC. v. ROGERS ET AL.

December 9, 1938.

Per curiam.

We think that the two questions presented by the appeal in this case, one having to do with the doctrine of accession and the other with the recording acts, were properly disposed of by the Circuit Judge, and we approve the result of his decree. Under the admitted facts, the conclusion reached by him as to the first finds general support in the authorities, while his disposition of the second is clearly sustained by our own decisions, including Perkins v. Loan Exchange Bank, 43 S.C. 39, 20 S.E., 759, relied on by the appellant.

The Circuit order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STABLER and MESSRS. JUSTICES BONHAM, BAKER and FISHBURNE concur.

MR. JUSTICE CARTER did not participate on account of illness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOODRICH SILVERTOWN, INC. v. ROGERS et al
(Dec 9, 1938)