LOWER MAIN STREET BANK v. PARKER et al

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14819

Attorney(S)

Mr. O.L. Long, for appellant, Mrs. Annie R. Parker, cites: Negotiable instruments: Sec 398, Code 1932; 167 S.E., 27; 133 S.E., 539; 170 S.E., 439; 100 S.C. 28; 84 S.E., 299; 127 S.E., 441; 35 S.E., 764; 38 S.E., 462; 45 S.C. 83; 22 S.E., 747. Equitable estoppel: 138 S.C. 154; 113 S.C. 282; 157 S.C. 137; 188 S.E., 789. Messrs. Charles B. Elliott, for respondent, Lower Main Street Bank, and Tobias Turner, for respondent, Mrs. Lila May M. Richey, cite: Negotiable instruments: Sec. 6798, Code 1932; 97 S.C. 136; 81 S.E., 644; 276 P., 659. Rights of purchaser of assignment in blank: 67 S.C. 377; 45 S.E., 927. Equitable estoppel: 113 S.C. 282; 102 S.E., 328; 138 S.C. 354; 136 S.E., 300.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14819

Attorney(S)

Mr. O.L. Long, for appellant, Mrs. Annie R. Parker, cites: Negotiable instruments: Sec 398, Code 1932; 167 S.E., 27; 133 S.E., 539; 170 S.E., 439; 100 S.C. 28; 84 S.E., 299; 127 S.E., 441; 35 S.E., 764; 38 S.E., 462; 45 S.C. 83; 22 S.E., 747. Equitable estoppel: 138 S.C. 154; 113 S.C. 282; 157 S.C. 137; 188 S.E., 789. Messrs. Charles B. Elliott, for respondent, Lower Main Street Bank, and Tobias Turner, for respondent, Mrs. Lila May M. Richey, cite: Negotiable instruments: Sec. 6798, Code 1932; 97 S.C. 136; 81 S.E., 644; 276 P., 659. Rights of purchaser of assignment in blank: 67 S.C. 377; 45 S.E., 927. Equitable estoppel: 113 S.C. 282; 102 S.E., 328; 138 S.C. 354; 136 S.E., 300.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LOWER MAIN STREET BANK v. PARKER ET AL.

February 7, 1939. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE BONHAM.

The history of the distressing events out of which this litigation arose is clearly set forth in the decree of Judge Thurmond, from which this appeal comes to us. We have given full and careful consideration to the issues involved and are satisfied that the Circuit decree states sound conclusions. Let it be reported.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STABLER and MESSRS. JUSTICES BAKER and FISHBURNE concur.

MR. JUSTICE CARTER did not participate on account of illness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

LOWER MAIN STREET BANK v. PARKER ET AL.

Comments