Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Royall Wright and McEachin Townsend, for appellant, cite: Contracts: 183 S.C. 413; 191 S.E., 220; 297 F., 422; 36 F.2d 265. Fraud: 27 C.J., 50; 12 R.C.L., 430; 79 Am. Dec., 255; 84 S.E., 937; 176 S.C. 207; 180 S.E., 13; 1 Strob., 220; 47 Am. Dec., 550; 13 N.E., 465; 161 S.C. 540; 159 S.E., 923; 194 S.C. 636; 186 S.E., 77; 186 S.E., 897. Pleadings: 174 S.C. 150; 177 S.E., 29; 54 F.2d 933; 160 S.E., 84; 144 U.S. 527; 127 S.C. 508; 121 S.E., 547; 133 S.E., 174. Separable controversy: 53 S.E., 244; 163 S.E., 116; 5 F.2d 1001; 304 U.S. 64; 58 S.Ct., 817; 70 S.C. 108; 49 S.E., 232; 176 S.C. 411; 180 S.E., 476; 40 F.2d 951; 232 U.S. 146; 58 L.Ed., 544; 229 U.S. 102; 57 L.Ed., 1090. Messrs. Samuel Want and Willcox, Hardee Wallace, for respondent, cite: Separable controversy: 183 S.C. 413; 191 S.E., 220; 297 F., 422; 36 F.2d 265. As to acts of agent: 48 S.C. 165; 26 S.E., 224; 124 S.C. 19; 115 S.E., 900; 121 S.C. 324; 113 S.E., 637; 193 S.E., 426; 90 F.2d 637. Fraudulent joinder: 300 F., 812; 152 S.C. 322; 150 S.E., 309.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Royall Wright and McEachin Townsend, for appellant, cite: Contracts: 183 S.C. 413; 191 S.E., 220; 297 F., 422; 36 F.2d 265. Fraud: 27 C.J., 50; 12 R.C.L., 430; 79 Am. Dec., 255; 84 S.E., 937; 176 S.C. 207; 180 S.E., 13; 1 Strob., 220; 47 Am. Dec., 550; 13 N.E., 465; 161 S.C. 540; 159 S.E., 923; 194 S.C. 636; 186 S.E., 77; 186 S.E., 897. Pleadings: 174 S.C. 150; 177 S.E., 29; 54 F.2d 933; 160 S.E., 84; 144 U.S. 527; 127 S.C. 508; 121 S.E., 547; 133 S.E., 174. Separable controversy: 53 S.E., 244; 163 S.E., 116; 5 F.2d 1001; 304 U.S. 64; 58 S.Ct., 817; 70 S.C. 108; 49 S.E., 232; 176 S.C. 411; 180 S.E., 476; 40 F.2d 951; 232 U.S. 146; 58 L.Ed., 544; 229 U.S. 102; 57 L.Ed., 1090. Messrs. Samuel Want and Willcox, Hardee Wallace, for respondent, cite: Separable controversy: 183 S.C. 413; 191 S.E., 220; 297 F., 422; 36 F.2d 265. As to acts of agent: 48 S.C. 165; 26 S.E., 224; 124 S.C. 19; 115 S.E., 900; 121 S.C. 324; 113 S.E., 637; 193 S.E., 426; 90 F.2d 637. Fraudulent joinder: 300 F., 812; 152 S.C. 322; 150 S.E., 309.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

DAVIS CLANTON v. C.I.T. CORPORATION ET AL.

April 5, 1939. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE BONHAM.

The cardinal question in this case is this: Does the complaint show a separable controversy between residents of different states, which entitles the defendant to have the case removed to the Federal Court for trial?

The matter was heard by Hon. L.D. Lide, Judge of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, who granted the order for the removal of the cause to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina. From his decree, this appeal comes to us.

The well-considered order of Judge Lide meets our approval. Let it be reported.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STABLER and MESSRS. JUSTICES BAKER and FISHBURNE concur.

MR. JUSTICE CARTER did not participate on account of illness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DAVIS CLANTON v. C.I.T. CORPORATION et al
(Apr 5, 1939)