FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA v. LEDFORD

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

15112

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Carlisle, Brown Carlisle, for appellant, cite: Presumptions: 166 S.C. 523; 165 S.E., 190; 177 S.C. 390; 181 S.E., 472. Agency: 169 S.C. 16; 168 S.E., 188; 125 S.C. 457; 118 S.E., 817; 135 S.C. 1; 133 S.E., 431; 2 C.J., 432; 162 S.C. 162; 160 S.E., 432; 136 S.C. 267 134 S.E., 352; 69 S.C. 429; 48 S.E., 466; 22 C.J., 376; 16 Cyc., 1005; 185 S.C. 523; 194 S.E., 642; 114 A.L.R., 1244; 114 S.C. 488; 104 S.E., 30; 17 S.C. 139; 111 S.C. 309; 97 S.E., 843; 2 C.J., 624; 22 C.J., 158. Agency by estoppel: 168 S.C. 285; 167 S.E., 500; 182 S.C. 135; 188 S.E., 789; 84 S.C. 426; 65 S.E., 108. Authority of agent: 189 S.C. 487; 1 S.E.2d 508; 132 S.C. 340; 127 S.E., 562; 192 S.E., 131; 168 S.C. 33; 166 S.E., 785; 157 S.C. 154; 154 S.E., 112; 147 S.C. 27; 144 S.E., 592; 146 S.C. 450; 144 S.E., 162; 144 S.C. 271; 142 S.E., 623; 142 S.C. 375; 140 S.E., 804; 139 S.C. 95; 137 S.E., 329; 139 S.C. 52; 137 S.E., 204; 138 S.C. 354; 136 S.E., 300; 136 S.C. 267; 134 S.E., 352; 135 S.C. 365; 133 S.E., 834; 135 S.C. 1; 133 S.E., 451; 132 S.C. 340; 127 S.E., 562; 128 S.C. 417; 122 S.E., 511; 74 S.C. 221; 54 S.E., 268. Messrs. Lyles Daniel, for respondents, cite: Res gestae: 136 S.C. 267; 134 S.E., 252; 36 S.C. 10; 14 S.E., 982. Agency: 142 S.C. 375; 140 S.E., 804; 138 S.C. 35; 136 S.E., 300; 65 S.C. 105; 43 S.E., 396; 135 S.C. 368, 133 S.E., 834; 132 S.C. 340; 127 S.E., 562.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA v. LEDFORD ET AL.

July 8, 1940.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE FISHBURNE.

The plaintiff in this suit seeks to foreclose a mortgage covering realty situated in the County of Spartanburg. The controversy between the parties relates to a claimed credit in the sum of $400.88. The proof shows that on January 5, 1935, this amount was turned over by the defendant, Alma E. Ledford, to F. Gentry Harris, an attorney at law, who died by his own hand on February 5, 1935. The money in the form of a check was delivered to Mr. Harris by the named defendant, to be forwarded to the plaintiff as a credit on her mortgage. It is undisputed that the money was never received by the plaintiff.

The question presented by the appeal is whether or not Harris received the amount as an agent for the plaintiff.

The matter was referred to Honorable Leroy Moore, Master in equity for Spartanburg County, under a general order of reference. By his report he disallowed the claimed credit, and recommended the foreclosure of the mortgage. Upon exceptions being taken to his report by the defendants to the Circuit Court, that Court rendered the judgment now appealed from, sustaining the exceptions and allowing the credit for $400.88.

We have carefully studied the record, and are convinced that the conclusions reached by the Master in equity in his excellent order are sound and correct, and we adopt his report as the opinion of this Court, and direct that it be published.

Judgment reversed, and case remanded for such further orders as may be necessary for carrying out the recommendations of the Master.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MESSRS. JUSTICES BAKER and STUKES and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE J. STROM THURMOND concur.

FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA v. LEDFORD ET AL.

Comments