Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MAY v. WILSON ET AL.

March 27, 1942.

Per curiam.

The appellant has failed to comply with the rule of this Court (Rule 8, Section 2) by stating in his brief the "questions involved;" and it is very doubtful if some of the warranted exceptions comply with Rule 4, Section 6.

Waiving all of this, we have carefully read the record herein, and are satisfied with the result of the order of Honorable P.H. Stoll, Circuit Judge, from which this appeal is prosecuted; and we direct that said order, with minor changes and some deletions made by us, be published as the opinion of this Court.

Affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MESSRS. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES BAKER, FISHBURNE and STUKES, and CIRCUIT JUDGE G.B. GREENE, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE. concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAY v. WILSON et al
(Mar 27, 1942)