Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number 15447 Advocates Mr. A.S. Merrimon, of Sumter, Counsel for Appellant, cites: As to Easement passing by Implied Grant: 9 R.C.L., 755; 19 C.J., 914; 9 R.C.L., 757; 142 S.C. 223, 141 S.E., 375; 5 Rich., 405; 170 N.C. 305, 87 S.E., 224; 220 F., 80, 135 C.C.A., 648; 56 Ohio St., 463, 47 N.E., 653; 1 Va. Dec., 141; 49 L.R.A. (Ky), 417, and authorities therein; Annotations to 34 Utah, 116, 26 L.R.A. (N.S.), 315. As to "degree of necessity" in connection with Easements: 9 R.C.L., 763-765; 19 C.J., 919; 19 L.R.A. (N.Y.), 99; 210 Mass. 402, 97 N.E., 54, 38 L.R.A. (N.S.), 882; 143 S.C. 223, 141 S.E., 375. As to deed in statutory form carrying Easement: 143 S.C. 223, 141 S.E., 375; 185 S.C. 489, 194 S.E., 326; 115 Ga. 77, 41 S.E., 585. As to Respondent taking title subject to easement previously acquired by Appellant: 143 S.C. 223, 141 S.E., 375; 26 L.R.A. (N.S.), 315 (Utah), Annotations. As to "necessity" being determined by conditions at time of conveyance: 9 R.C.L., 755; Jones on Easements, Sect. 129; 19 C.J., 919, 920; 20 Ohio Appeals, 442, 152 N.E., 734; 181 Iowa, 965, 165 N.W., 216; 54 Me., 276, 89 Am. Dec., 748; 89 Ohio St., 311, 106 N.E., 46; 134 N.Y., 385, 32 N.E., 18, 19 L.R.A., 99; 54 N.J. Eq., 270, 33 A., 794. As to Easement being "way of necessity" appurtenant to lot: 143 S.C. 223, 141 S.E., 375; 72 W. Va., 68, 78 S.E., 233, 46 L.R.A. (N.S.), 156; 107 Conn., 32, 139 A., 348; 84 A., 743, 118 Md., 491; 2 Hill, 642, Note; 185 S.C. 489, 194 S.E., 326. As to Easement by Prescription: 197 S.C. 280, 15 S.E.2d 349. As to effect on Court of verdict of Jury in Equity Case: 103 S.C. 299, 87 S.E., 542; 27 S.C. 623, 3 S.E., 221; 5 S.C. 411. Mr. Wayne Law Clifton, of Sumter, Counsel for Respondent, cites: As to Easement being appurtenance: 19 C. J., 914; 5 Rich., 405; 170 N.C. 305, 87 S.E., 224; 19 C. J., 868, Sect. 6; 19 C.J., 689, Sect. 7; 272 Mich., 448, 455, 262 N.W., 388. As to "way of necessity": 19 C.J., 926, Sect. 120 and Sect. 121; 6 Mo., 624, 633, 35 Am. Dec., 456; 200 Ky., 478, 34 A.L.R., 230 (at p. 732, 34 A.L. R.); 14 Mass. 49, 55, 7 Am. Dec., 188. As to Easement by Prescription: 37 C.J., 282, Sect. 176; 37 C.J., 283, Sect. 177; 19 C.J., 898, Sect. 75; 19 C.J., 884, Sect. 43. See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. MERRIMON v. McCAIN. July 22, 1942. Per Curiam: After a careful study and consideration of the record in this case, in the light of the issues made by the exceptions, we are of the opinion that the Circuit Court in its decree correctly decided the case. We adopt that decree as the judgment of this Court. Let it be reported. Judgment affirmed. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MESSRS. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES FISHBURNE and STUKES, and CIRCUIT JUDGE G. DEWEY OXNER, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, concur.