Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number 15566 Attorney(S) Mr. Henry E. Davis and Messrs. Royall Wright, all of Florence, S.C. Counsel for Appellant, cite: As to error of Trial Judge in holding that Mortgagor-Plaintiff was entitled to Jury Trial, and in Staying Equity Suit of Appellant against said Mortgagor-Plaintiff: 132 S.C. 410, 129 S.E., 629; 17 S.C. 32; 27 S.C. 408, 3 S.E., 781; 108 S.C. 206, 93 S.E., 770; 69 S.C. 186, 48 S.E., 255; 70 S.C. 253, 49 S.C. 845; 83 S.C. 49, 64 S.E., 1014; 106 S.C. 386, 91 S.E., 296. As to Matters of Equitable Cognizance in Amended Complaint: 97 S.C. 178, 81 S.E., 424; 100 S.C. 397, 84 S.E., 992; 179 S.C. 506, 184 S.E., 105; 92 S.C. 501, 75 S.E., 889; 99 S.C. 31, 82 S.E., 997; 115 S.C. 452, 106 S.E., 473; 116 S.C. 92, 107 S.E., 320; 119 S.C. 273, 112 S.E., 94; 120 S.C. 232, 113 S.E., 78; 125 S.C. 187, 118 S.E., 308; 129 S.C. 367, 124 S.E., 780; 112 S.C. 356, 99 S.E., 833; 108 S.C. 206, 93 S.E., 770; 132 S.C. 410, 129 S.E., 629; 132 S.C. 410, 129 S.E., 44; 17 S.C. 32; 44 S.C. 116, 21 S.E., 621. As to "Both Suits Arising Out of The Same Controversy": 43 S.C. 187, 20 S.E., 991; 197 S.C. 250, 15 S.E.2d 119; 69 S.C. 186, 48 S.E., 255; 66 S.C. 459, 45 S.E., 4; 99 S.C. 100, 82 S.E., 986; 113 S.C. 168, 101 S.E., 844; 168 S.C. 294, 167 S.E., 502; 192 S.C. 355, 6 S.E.2d 755. As to "Multiplicity of Suits": 132 S.C. 410, 129 S.E., 44; 132 S.C. 78, 129 S.E., 131; 142 S.C. 7, 140 S.E., 253; 146 S.C. 85, 143 S.E., 650; 159 S.C. 181, 156 S.E., 454; 173 S.C. 77, 174 S.E., 902. As to Right of Mortgagee to Foreclosure and Accounting in Equity: 145 S.C. 364, 142 S.E., 805; 132 S.C. 410, 129 S.E., 44. As to Trial of Equity Case by Jury: 192 S.C. 355, 6 S.E.2d 755; 193 S.C. 422, 8 S.E.2d 422; 197 S.C. 250, 15 S.E.2d 119. Messrs. McEachin Townsend, of Florence, S.C. Counsel for Respondent, cite: As to Cause of Action in Law Case: 178 S.C. 111, 182 S.E., 319; 117 S.C. 137, 108 S.E., 189; 186 S.C. 77, 194 S.E., 636; 26 S.C. 415, 2 S.E., 314; 97 S.C. 178, 81 S.E., 424; 100 S.C. 397, 84 S.E., 992; 179 S.C. 506, 184 S.E., 105; 92 S.C. 501, 75 S.E., 889; 99 S.C. 31, 82 S.E., 997; 115 S.C. 452, 106 S.E., 473; 116 S.C. 92, 107 S.E., 320; 119 S.C. 273, 112 S.E., 94; 120 S.C. 232, 113 S.E., 78; 125 S.C. 187, 118 S.E., 308; 129 S.C. 367, 124 S.E., 780; 112 S.C. 356, 99 S.E., 830; 132 S.C. 410, 129 S.E., 629; 187 S.C. 168, 197 S.E., 215; 175 S.C. 23, 178 S.E., 252; 106 S.C. 25, 190 S.E., 161; 129 S.C. 18, S.E., 324; 44 S.C. 116, 21 S.E., 642; 146 S.C. 85, 143 S.E., 650, Dissent. Op. of Mr. Justice Carter; 142 S.C. 7, 140 S.E., 253; 132 S.C. 78, 129 S.E., 131; 159 S.C. 181, 15 S.E.2d 454; 173 S.C. 77, 174 S.E., 902. As to Amendment of Law Complaint Altering the Cause of Action Presented: 162 S.C. 253, 160 S.E., 731; 31 A.J., 572, Sec. 22, citing (N. Y.), 86 N.E., 460, 25 L.R.A. (NS), 264; 52 S.C. 461, 30 S.E., 485; 202 S.C. 183, 24 S.E., 2d 266. Judges PER CURIAM: See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. RUSH v. THOMPSON.THOMPSON July 26, 1943. PER CURIAM: After a careful study and consideration of the record in this case, in the light of the issues made by the exceptions, and after considering the briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that the Circuit Court in its well-considered decree, correctly decided the case. We adopt that decree as the judgment of this Court. Let it be reported. Judgment affirmed. MESSRS. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES BAKER, FISHBURNE and STUKES, and CIRCUIT JUDGES SEASE and HENDERSON, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICES, concur.