Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Alker, Appellant, v. The Philadelphia National Bank.

Practice — Abandonment of claim — Delay in prosecution — Laches — Judgments — Non pros — Discretion of court.

In a suit in assumpsit to recover $502,531.85 with interest from August 24, 1933 (the date on which the alleged cause of action arose) in which it appeared that the writ of summons was issued on August 17, 1939 but no statement of claim was filed until December 21, 1944; that prior to the filing of the statement many of the persons having knowledge of the facts relating to the suit had died; and that plaintiff gave no satisfactory reason for the delay in prosecuting the claim, it was Held that a judgment of non pros should be affirmed.

OPINION PER CURIAM, January 12, 1953:

The Judgment of Non Pros is affirmed on the Opinion of President Judge FRANK SMITH.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALKER v. PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK
(Jan 12, 1953)