Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MEREDITH v. KENT'S EX'RS. — 1 Mart., 28.

The deposition of a witness residing in another state may be read, though he be in the State at the time of trial, and has been summoned in the cause while in the State.

Objected by Lowther, for the plaintiff, who opposed the introduction of the testimony totis viribus, upon the ground that this was not the best evidence; as the witness might have been and was actually summoned in the cause, whilst in the State.

But McCOY, J., declared it to be the settled practice to admit the deposition absolutely; as by the residence of the witness in another State, there could be no forfeiture for nonattendance, though summoned.

Cited: Kinzey v. King, 28 N.C. 78; Stern v. Herren, 101 N.C. 519; State v. Means, 175 N.C. 823.

(53)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEREDITH v. KENT'S
(Oct 1, 1792)