Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

STATE v. JOSEPH WAPLES.

Indictment, forcible detainer from Cornish, a mulatto, who had rented for one year of Surman, who was prosecutor and offered as a witness; objected to on account of his interest, and argued by Peery and Hall for defendant, and Wilson for the State.

PER CURIAM.

He is a witness to prove the force and no more than the force; he cannot prove either a possession or a lease.

N.B. At Dover the next week, the Court, on argument by Clark and Fisher for defendant and Miller for the State, in a prosecution against one Beauchamp under the Act of Assembly for assisting in stealing a horse (though the principal was not yet tried, being, as was said, all principals by the Act), determined that the prosecutor, being owner of the horse, should only be allowed to prove the stealing, but not the property or possession. [ 2 Del. Laws 667]. Vide Dall. 68 and 110. Vide, contra, State v. Jacobs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WAPLES
(Apr 1, 1795)