Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

MORRIS WILLING SWANWICK v. STOKES. — 1 Mart., 20

This was a default and inquiry. The Court ruled that evidence might be given of the difference of exchange between this country and Philadelphia, and in the charge (as bills had not been usually drawn in Edenton, and no one knew the exchange), the Court said to the jury that they might discover the exchange by attending to the value of hard money in this country, and knowing what dollars passed at in Philadelphia.

SPENCER, J., and WILLIAMS, J., present.

NOTE. — See Emsley v. Lee, post, 29.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORRIS v. STOKES
(May 1, 1789)