Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

TRAIN, Administratrix of Train, v. GEORGE CONWELL, FISHER CONWELL and ELIAS, Executors of Elias Conwell.

Certiorari upon a scire facias on a judgment recovered against George Fisher, and Elias Conwell, executors of E. Conwell, deceased. Nul tiel record pleaded. On the trial of the issue before the court, the plaintiff produced a record from the Court of Common Pleas of a judgment confessed by George Conwell as executor etc.

The defendant's counsel stated that the record produced was only of a judgment against the executor who confessed, for by the Statute of 9 Edw. III (Salk. 312) certain process must go against the other executors before judgment can be against them of the goods in their hands of the testator's estate; and that one executor cannot confess a judgment that shall bind the other executors, because they may plead different pleas, 1 Str. 20; and therefore the record produced being only of a judgment against one, did not support the plaintiff against the plea of nul tiel record, but there may be, for aught the court know, a judgment that will, Salk. 52.

Plaintiff's counsel cited a marginal note, 2 Bac.Abr. 395 reciting a marginal note in Dyer, as contradicting 1 Str. in loc. cit.

PER CURIAM.

The cases cited show that a judgment confessed by one executor may be reversed, but still those cases cited by the defendants' counsel notwithstanding, it is a judgment and therefore supports the plaintiff against the plea, but we do not say what we should do, if the other executors were before us upon the execution.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TRAIN v. CONWELL
(Nov 1, 1793)