Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MOORING v. STANTON. — 1 Mart., 52

Money paid at request of another for his gambling debt is recoverable.

On a plea of the statute of gaming. 1788, 5, 633.

HAYWOOD, J.

Money lent to play with, or to pay, at the time of loss, is not recoverable. But it is otherwise of a gaming debt paid by a third person, at the request of the loser.

NOTE. — See Act of 1788 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 51), and the cases upon the construction of it, Anonymous, 3 N.C. 231; Stowell v. Guthrie, ibid., 297; Hodges v. Pitman, 4 N.C. 276; Turner v. Peacock, 13 N.C. 303; Hudspeth v. Wilson, ibid., 372; Dunn v. Holloway, 16 N.C. 322.

(71)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOORING v. STANTON
(Sep 1, 1795)