Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

MURFREE v. REDDING.

Making a man master and giving him command of a ship is, ipso facto, giving him power to take a load for freight in a foreign port; and his contract in such case binds the owner.

PER CURIAM.

A master has a right to make such contracts, and usually is the person who does actually make them. The owners cannot be in every port where the ship goes to make them. The very making a man master, and giving him the command of the ship, is a giving him power to take a load for freight in a foreign port, or in a port at a distance from the place of the owner's residence. His appearing as master is enough for any man to contract with him upon the credit of his employer; and as it appears in the present case by the statement of Redding himself that the cargo was lost by the attempt of Scranton to cross the bar without a pilot, and as the rule respondeat superior is here applicable with great propriety, therefore let the injunction be dissolved as to all but the value of the load of tar; and as to that, let it be continued until the hearing. Books cited: Moll. b. 2, ch. 1, secs. 5 and 6; Moll. b. 2, ch. 2, sec. 14; Term Rep., 75, 78; Lex. Merca., 95; Sid. 411; 2 Ch. C., 238.

See Howard v. Ross, 3 N.C. 333.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURFREE v. REDDING
(Apr 1, 1796)