Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CLOUD v. DAVIS.

A rule had been obtained in this cause to take the depositions of witnesses generally before any judge or justice of the peace. Upon the return of the depositions it appeared that one of the witnesses lived and was examined in the State of New Jersey and the other in the State of Maryland.

CHIEF JUSTICE.

The practice has been invariably to issue a commission when the intention was to take depositions out of the state, unless in the cases where a special rule for the purpose was agreed to by the parties. A general rule to take depositions before any judge or justice of the peace is confined to the state. If the party designs under his rule to take depositions out of the state, he must have it so expressed in the rule. The depositions in the present case are not warranted by the rule under which they were taken and cannot therefore be read.

PER CURIAM.

Depositions rejected.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLOUD v. DAVIS
(Feb 1, 1797)