Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

R. SCHAW'S ADM'R, v. R. SCHAW'S HEIRS. — Tayl., 125.

An administrator is not entitled to claim anything for loss of time and personal services, though he will be allowed his necessary expenditures.

HAYWOOD, J.

By the Act of 1789, cap. 23, sec. 2. The administrator shall retain in his hands no more of the intestate's estate than amounts to his necessary charges and disbursements, and such debts as he may legally pay within two years after the administration granted. For actual expenditures, therefore, he is entitled to an allowance, but not for loss of time and personal services. Act of 1799, cap. 22; 3 P. Wil., 249.

NOTE. See Clarke v. Cotton, 17 N.C. 51.

Cited: Parker v. Grant, 91 N.C. 343.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHAW v. SCHAW
(Jan 1, 1799)