Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

SMITH v. BOWEN.

1. Any fact stated in the bill and denied in the answer may be inquired into if the counsel require it, and the Court will not refuse to submit it as an issue to the jury.

2. A conveyance cannot be deemed fraudulent to defeat creditors unless it be proved that there was a creditor to be defrauded.

TAYLOR, J.,

said in his charge to the jury: It is not enough for the maintenance of this issue that the parties supposed a certain person would recover against the grantor, and that the conveyance was made to defeat that person. It should appear that he was actually a creditor.

And upon this issue the jury found for the plaintiff, that it was not to defraud creditors, though there was full proof that it was intended to protect the property against the effects of an action, then depending, in which the plaintiff claimed damages for the conversion of certain slaves, in which he finally failed.

NOTE. — As to the first point, see 1 Rev. Stat. ch. 32, sec. 4, which provides that the court of equity may, at their discretion, submit a fact to the jury or decide it themselves. Upon the second point, see Brady v. Allison, post, 348.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. BOWEN
(Jan 1, 1804)