Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

CARR v. HAIRSTON. — 1 L. R., 249.

By the act of 1784 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 104, secs. 1-4) the interposition of a jury is necessary in the laying out, altering, or changing roads; but in deciding, in the first instance that there shall be a road in a particular section of the country, or in discontinuing such roads as may be deemed useless, the jury has nothing to do, the whole power being given to the court.

(21) HENDERSON, J.

By the act of 1784, in the laying out, altering, or changing roads the interposition of a jury is necessary; and the law has directed that damages may be assessed and the most proper grounds pointed out over which the road shall run. But in deciding, in the first instance, that there shall be a road in a particular section of the country, or in discontinuing such roads as may be deemed useless, a jury has nothing to do; the whole power is given to the court. We therefore think the order of the county court, discontinuing the road in question, is a legal one, and such as the court might well have made. It follows, therefore, that the defendant is entitled to judgment.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARR v. HAIRSTON
(Jul 1, 1811)