Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

ARRINGTON v. BATTLE.

From Nash.

Question of costs. In an action of detinue, the parties refer the case to arbitration. The arbitrators award that the defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the slave sued for, and that the plaintiff shall pay to the defendant the purchase money for the slaves; but were silent as to the costs of the suit: Held, that each party shall pay his own costs.

HALL, J.

The only question that can arise here is with respect to the action of detinue. In that action the arbitrators directed the negro to be delivered up by Arrington, and a certain sum of money to be paid by Battle. Thus the rights of the parties with respect to the subject-matter of the suit were settled. This Court is not applied to set that award aside; there is no law which in a case situated as this is directs that either party shall pay the whole costs. Upon legal principles, then, it will follow that each party shall pay his own costs to the clerk, as for work and labor done. Those (247) costs being ascertained, the clerk is at liberty to issue an execution against each party separately. In the other action Arrington must pay the costs, because the arbitrators have said so.

Cited: Debrule v. Scott, 53 N.C. 74.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARRINGTON v. BATTLE
(Jan 1, 1813)