Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

HUDSON SMITH v. GUESTIER.

[Judges present. . . . WASHINGTON, LIVINGSTON, TODD, DUVALL, STORY.[fn*]] [fn*]1The Chief Justice did not attend until Thursday, February 13. He received an injury by the over-setting of the stage coach on his journey from Richmond.

ON the first day of the term, Harper moved for, and obtained a rule to show cause why this case, which was decided at February term 1810, should not be re-heard. The motion was grounded upon a statement of facts which was filed.

When this rule was mentioned again by Harper he was informed

BY THE COURT, that the case could not be re-heard after the term in which it had been decided.

GENERAL RULE.

Winder, requested information from the Court whether the general rule which directs that only two counsellors should be heard on each side of any cause in this Court, was intended to prevent the division of a cause into distinct points, and the hearing of two counsellors on each point.

Washington, justice. (The chief justice being absent) informed the bar that the Court considered the rule as inflexible, whatever may be the number of points or parties in a cause.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUDSON SMITH v. GUESTIER
(Feb 1, 1812)